SERMON PREACHED BY
THE REVEREND DR. HAROLD T. LEWIS, RECTOR
CALVARY EPISCOPAL CHURCH,
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
ON THE SEVENTH SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST
23 JULY 2006
"You are no longer strangers and
sojourners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and the household
of God." (Ephesians 2:10)
I turned on the TV the other day and saw
the talking head of an incumbent politician desperately seeking
reelection. He gives his pedigree --- the son and grandson of
hard-working people who migrated to this country from Europe.
His grandfather was a coal miner, and to hear the politician
tell the story, his family has helped to make America great.
He comes from what some call "good immigrant stock."
Then he contrasts his own family to a new wave of immigrants
who allegedly are trying to get into the U.S. with "more
sinister intentions." They must be stopped at all costs,
we are told. Walls must be erected at the Mexican border, and
millions of dollars must be spent so that thousands of guards
can be deployed to bar their entry. This must be done not only
to keep such undesirables out, but, we are told, to honor those
who became a part of America's great melting pot by playing "according
to the rules." The politician, it should come as no surprise,
is identified with what has become known as the "religious
right" and the paid political announcement comes as yet
another reminder that that group is neither. It has, in the name
of religion, constructed and justified a thinly veiled theology
of bigotry.
Let us unpack the statement. What is "sinister"
about the intentions of the new wave of immigrants? Nothing at
all. They seek entry into the "land of the free and the
home of the brave" for the same reasons the politician's
grandparents did --- to improve the lot of their families. Rules?
The politician needs to remind himself that the rules --- including
quota regulations --- have long been weighed in favor of immigrants
from Europe or those who look like them, and less in favor of
people of color. This is why boatloads of Cubans, for example,
can routinely be granted asylum status while Haitians are more
likely to be sent back, in their barely seaworthy dinghies, to
Port-au-Prince. The rules about which we should be concerned
are the more stringent immigration laws born of a fear that it
will be only a matter of time before the so-called minorities
outnumber the majority culture --- and this development, to the
Christian Right politician, somehow smacks of being un-American.
The commercial came to mind when I read this morning's epistle,
and I couldn't help but notice the stark contrast between the
politician's message and that of Saint Paul in his letter to
the Ephesians. While the politician preaches the necessity of
erecting walls, Paul makes it clear that Jesus came precisely
to break down walls. "For he is our peace," Paul writes
to the church at Ephesus, "in his flesh that has made both
groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall, that is,
the hostility between us." Who are the "both groups"?
They are the Jews and the Gentles, and yes, I will remind you
yet again that the Greek work for Gentiles is ethnoi.
Now Paul was thoroughly familiar with the
pecking order in a Greek city-state (or polis) such as
Ephesus. Here the ethnoi, the Gentiles, were the only
ones entitled to full-fledged citizenship. The Jews, whose true
home was the Temple at Jerusalem, were clearly a rung below.
Most of the Jews in a city-state were classified as strangers
or xenoi (It is interesting that the word "xenophobia"
--- fear of strangers --- occurs in English, but I have never
heard the word "xenophilia" the love of strangers.)
The xenoi were considered aliens, outsiders, exiles, spies,
and generally people not to be trusted. Other Jews were "sojourners"
(paroikoi, literally those outside the house) and they
were more or less like Jews with a green card. They had limited
privileges in the polis, but lived under the constant
threat that such privileges could be summarily revoked.
Now it is an interesting aspect of human
nature that when underdogs become top dogs, they often imitate
the behavior of their former oppressors. When we leave the city-state
and go to Jerusalem, the tables are turned. There, it is the
Gentiles who are the second-class citizens, if they dared enter
the Temple, they found this sign at the entrance to the inner
court: "No man of another nation is to enter, and whoever
is caught will have himself to blame that his death ensues."
Unfortunately, the church took over where the synagogue left
off. Believing that Jesus came to redeem the Jewish community,
some of the new Christians proclaimed that Gentiles would have
to become Jews before converting to Christianity, or otherwise
put, be circumcised before they were baptized.
Enter Paul. He takes all these exclusive
concepts and turns them on their head. He strikes a blow for
inclusivity two thousand years before the Episcopal Church embraced
the concept. In the Church of Jesus Christ, says Paul, there
will be no more of this in-group out-group stuff. Those differences
have melted away in God's household, the church, where everyone
--- Gentiles and Jews, slave and free, men and women, are fellow
citizens, sympolitai, that is, one with the polis, the new polis,
the city of God. Moreover, everyone joins the ranks of the saints
(hagioi) who now have equal access to the Throne of Heavenly
grace. Why? Because that right of access does not depend on the
laws which men contrive, but comes instead from the free gift
of the Spirit.
We hear a lot today about the "clear
meaning of Scripture." The phrase is often evoked to justify
discrimination against women or sexual minorities. Well, what
about the clear meaning of today's Scripture? What could be clearer
than Paul's theology of inclusivity? Yet probably no concept
has been more ignored than this one. In his epistle to the Romans,
[12:12] Paul says that our role as Christians is to transform
the world and not be conformed to it, but conforming is exactly
what Christians have done, trying to make the church in its own
image. We have imported our prejudices and imposed them on the
church. Like the politician who urged the erection of walls,
church folk have erected walls between various groups. Walls
keep people apart, making them suspicious and distrustful of
each other. Walls kill fellowship, breed prejudice and reinforce
stereotypes. The columnist Maureen Dowd once wrote that stereotypes
can nevertheless be comforting; shallow though they may be, they
keep familiar things familiar. And yet, if Robert Frost is correct,
we have an uneasy feeling when we erect walls. "Something
there is that doesn't like a wall," he reminds us. Walls
separate black from white, rich from poor, straight from gay.
Sometimes walls have been erected to separate ethnicities. Many
Roman Catholic bishops, for example, have discovered that the
easiest way to start World War III is to propose a merger between
an Irish parish and an Italian parish.
The story is told about a king who owned an uninhabited castle.
It was the constant target of vandals and looters. They would
come and walk off with furniture, tapestries, even windows ---
whatever they could carry. When it seemed on the brink of total
destruction, the king decided to do something to protect it,
so he hired a local contractor and assigned him the task of building
a wall around the castle. The fee was agreed upon and the contractor
began his work. But after a short time the contractor began having
trouble finding rocks for the wall. So he called the king to
complain about the situation. The king sharply replied, "I
don't care where you get the rocks, I want you to build that
wall!" Some time later the king came to see the progress
of the work, and found a beautiful high wall. He was so impressed
with the fine work the contractor had done. It was a perfect
wall for his castle. But then he went through the wall, and found
that the castle had gone! The ingenious contractor had used the
rocks from the castle to build the wall which was being erected
to protect the castle. When all was said and done, the beautiful
wall had been erected but was protecting nothing! So often we
erect walls to protect our cherished selves, but by the time
the wall is built, we find that we have torn down ourselves to
such an extent that there is precious little left to protect.
St. Paul tells us that Jesus has abolished
the laws and ordinances that created walls, but we seem to pass
new laws resulting in the creation of new walls. And this occurs
not only in society, but in the church. We seem to be witnessing
the creation of new canons, or the interpretation of old ones,
designed to erect more walls between groups within the household
of God. Today's epistle makes it clear what our role as Christians
should be. I wonder if this week we might commit ourselves to
breaking down one wall, between ourselves and a neighbor, family
member or a loved one. In this way we might be joined together
and grow into a holy temple in the Lord.
Let us pray:
Races and peoples, low, we stand divided,
And sharing not our griefs, no joy can share;
By wars and tumults, love is mocked, derided;
His saving cross no nation yet will bear;
Thy kingdom come, O Lord, thy will be done.
How shall we love thee, holy hidden being,
If we love not the world which thou hast made?
Bind us in thine own love for better seeing,
Thy Word made flesh, and in a manger laid.
Thy Kingdom come, O Lord, thy will be done. AMEN.
["Father Eternal, ruler of creation," Hymnal 1982,
574]